MERCEDES-LACKEY Digest 1517 Topics covered in this issue include: 1) Holderkin Goddess??? by dprono-+AT+-planet.eon.net 2) Re: Urban Fantasies by Ben Schollnick 3) Re: Holderkin Goddess??? by Chris Manning 4) Re: How are you guys missing this?, other books by "John E Morris" 5) Re: How are you guys missing this? by LCM46 6) Re: How are you guys missing this? by Niki Nibbe 7) Re: How are you guys missing this? by Kenneth Allen Hyde 8) Re: How are you guys missing this? by Niki Nibbe 9) braid:lots and lots by Ana Cotton 10) Re: How are you guys missing this? by Kago23618 11) OBound/Fiddlers Faire by skyfire-+AT+-t-online.de (skyfire) 12) braid by "Marv Watson" 13) Red Star Rising by "marty l. adkins" 14) Re: OBound/Fiddlers Faire + what we read by Eleonora Scoseria 15) questions from a newbie by katiekins2-+AT+-juno.com (Katie Snyder) 16) Re: Holderkin Goddess??? by SenayRed ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 08 Mar 1998 18:25:37 From: dprono-+AT+-planet.eon.net To: mercedes-lackey-+AT+-herald.co.uk Subject: Holderkin Goddess??? Message-ID: <3.0.3.16.19980308182537.2fcf53d4-+AT+-planet.eon.net> >That brings ME to a "reading" question. > I've spent many an afternoon just staring at my library, >wondering what will satisfy me to reading. Am I the only one who goes >through this? heh, Amber, -I- thought that I was the only one! Sometimes I go to the library and pick up five or six books, read one, then decide that you dont wanna read the rest. They just dont feel right. I was just beginning to re-read AotQ today, and i noticed that the Holderkin worship a Goddess. Does this seem strange to you? I mean, they are a patriarchial (sp?) society, so wouldn't they then follow a male God? Or am I missing something? Comments? Do not pass go, do not collect $200? ;) Yvonne Shadowshape, bonded to Chiti, Chosen by Korla Goddess of Kelpies, Selkies, and the other Water-Borne Knight of Fluff *&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&*&* The Nerids pluck their lyres Where the green translucncy beats And with motionless eyes at gaze Make minstrily in the streets -Walter de la Mare, Sunk Lyoness ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Mar 1998 21:17:44 -0500 (EST) From: Ben Schollnick To: mercedes-lackey-+AT+-herald.co.uk Subject: Re: Urban Fantasies Message-ID: > Re the suicide thing, I DO NOT think that you have to be insane to commit > suicide, emotinally unbalanced, yes, I know from my attempt that I wasn't > exactly at peace with myself, unlike Vanyel at 15 I didn't know "Who I was, > what I wanted and who I wanted it with." I was severley confused and I > thought that a) the world would be a better off place without me and b) no-one > would miss me anyway. It was shortly after this that I got into LHM first of > all and I really sympathised with Van at the beginning, even to the point that > I realised that I had been doing what he did, cutting myself off emotionally > from all other people, afraid that if I cared I would get hurt. Even now i'm > not the most approachable person in the universe, as many people will tell > you, but I think i'm getting better. *G* I certainly know the feeling... I had my Girl Friend (basically) die in my arms... Even now after roughly 6 years, it's sometimes hard for me to not get depressed, and just wallow in self-pity... (And I really *HATE* whoever came up with the quote: "It's better to have loved, and lost, then to never love..." (I believe that's the exact quote?)... IMHO, it's worse, after all now you know what your missing...) But for several months, after Tammy died, I really didn't know what to do, and so forth. I occasionally thought about Suicide, but it's against my nature... I never acted on it, because I considered it to be a poor choice, a "cop-out".... etc... (Sorry I can't do much better than that, it's a "gut" instinct... type of decision....) > As a slight spin on this question and COMPLETELY un-Misty if you think people > who attempt suicide are insane what are your views on euthanasia? Now that's a tricky question.... I'd have to say that it depends on the circumstances and *why* euthanasia was performed... Personally, I think that euthanasia (or the right to die) is in a person's rights, just like the right to live is. For example, a cancer patient certainly has the right to die if they choose they can't continue (or for whatever reason). Now that *DOESN'T* mean I need to agree with their reasons... >g< But I can't see a rational reason to strap someone down and force them to continue. Are we suppose to have a suicide watch for this person for the rest of their life? If it was someone that I knew, I certainly would sit down and speak to them and play Devil's Advocate as best as I could... After all, I've had too many important people in my life be visited by Mr. Reaper.... But.........I can only do so much... - Ben ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 08 Mar 1998 21:34:03 -0500 From: Chris Manning To: mercedes-lackey-+AT+-herald.co.uk Subject: Re: Holderkin Goddess??? Message-ID: <3503551B.23E5-+AT+-voyager.net> dprono-+AT+-planet.eon.net wrote: > > I was just beginning to re-read AotQ today, and i noticed that the > Holderkin worship a Goddess. Does this seem strange to you? I mean, they > are a patriarchial (sp?) society, so wouldn't they then follow a male God? > Or am I missing something? Comments? Do not pass go, do not collect $200? ;) > Well, I know from reading the trilogy, somewhere it is mentioned that the Gods are the superiors while the Goddesses are the lowers in the Holderkin religion(I know there is textevd somewhere, but I tried looking, and just aren't good at detailed word searching... I'm sure the reference is in either AotQ or AFlight though). -- Chris Manning - wtknleo at voyager dot net - ICQ UIN 5409788 Lunar - Phantasy Star - Magic Knight RayEarth Davis on EsperNet and LunarNet ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Mar 1998 22:17:09 -0500 From: "John E Morris" To: Subject: Re: How are you guys missing this?, other books Message-ID: <01bd4b09$d8d70140$90109cd1-+AT+-default> >it?)...You obviously don't "understand what y'all are trying to get across." Yeah, I do get what y'all are trying to get across - the point is that Van's homosexuality was relatively unimportant to the main storyline of the book. I choose to debate this point, personally, since Van (as a fairly stereotypical gay character in the beginning) would never have been sent to Haven, never met Tylendel and never become a Herald or a Mage hade he not been gay. I also think to consider Vanyel's sexuality unimportant wilfully denies a major facet of the story.. It's kind of like saying, "Gee, that Othello...I never knew he was black..." It's not the MOST important thing, but it sure as hell figures into the mix. Oh yeah, and don't mock the Southern dialect. We are very proud of our language, and do not like to be made fun of because of it. >when I read Arrows, I didn't think "oh, my; Talia and Dirk are a HETEROSEXUAL >couple" or "wow, Talia and Kris are heterosexuals." > Of course you didn't. Characters who are "normal" don't stand out to other people who are "normal" >I don't think that it was as much that they didn't NOTICE, John, as much as >it wasn't a "Oh my God, I'm reading about a GAY couple" reaction Forgive me if I have misremembered here, but I seem to recall that the phrasing I was refering to said that the person in question did not REALIZE that Vanyel was gay. This doesn't mean "It didn't jump out at me, it didn't really make a difference", no...It means "I didn't know that Van was gay. This is a sort of general response...when I asked what non-genre fiction the rest of us read, I meant non-fantasy, non-sci-fi stuff. That's really what I was curious about...oh well. John E. Morris ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Mar 1998 23:29:11 EST From: LCM46 To: mercedes-lackey-+AT+-herald.co.uk Subject: Re: How are you guys missing this? Message-ID: <3ba97ce8.35037019-+AT+-aol.com> Your Laundry Goddess ascends from the basement, having found a file in someone's pants pockets and therefore breaking the chains keeping her bound to the washer---- I've gotta break out from lurker-dom to comment on this issue: In a message dated 98-03-08 22:32:44 EST, JEatonMorris writes: << Forgive me if I have misremembered here, but I seem to recall that the phrasing I was refering to said that the person in question did not REALIZE that Vanyel was gay. This doesn't mean "It didn't jump out at me, it didn't really make a difference", no...It means "I didn't know that Van was gay. >> Having read all the 'letters' on this issue--it stikes me that those who claimed innocence re: Van's sexuality were those that admitted reading the book when 12 to 14 years of age. Granted, youth today is much "smarter" at an earlier age, but, if they were brought up not hearing about homosexuality, the parts about Van just may have gone over their heads, so to speak. It just could have 'read' as a very nice, close friendship??? I dunno---that's just my 2 cents---I doubt that my 'reading' daughter would have caught the meaning at age 14, and she's not stupid by any stretch of the imagination. Let's give them the benefit of the doubt. Not everyone can 'relate' to gay at that age. Uh oh---they hear me typing---I'd better hide before they drag me back to the basement. Keep on keepin' on Lorraine Goddess of Domesticity/Laundry Appreciator of Penguins But I'm not dead yet! Monty Python/Holy Grail ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 08 Mar 1998 21:09:24 -0800 From: Niki Nibbe To: mercedes-lackey-+AT+-herald.co.uk Subject: Re: How are you guys missing this? Message-ID: <35037984.15F-+AT+-earthlink.net> My apologies to all listsibs who might be tired of this particular discussion (argument?) This is relatively OT, and I promise any future discourse will be held off the list. But since this included a few people on the list, I thought it might sill be OK to be posted. <> I can only assume you're talking about my including "y'all" in my reply. I wasn't mocking southern dialect. Now, while I have a tendency to speak that way myself, in this case, I was DIRECTLY quoting you. I chose not to remove the word "y'all" from what YOU said (why should I?) -- wasn't meant to sound like I was trying to make fun of you. I think you're trying to be difficult now; getting upset when I quote your sentences, telling me I'm making fun of your words. Secondly, perhaps I wasn't real clear when I said "I didn't realize Van was gay" -- which is why I wrote in to clarify. And no, you do not "get" what I was saying. Your take ("the point is that Van's homosexuality was relatively unimportant to the main storyline") is completely off-base. That's not what either of us was trying to say. (and I spent quite a while on my last post talking about Van and his life and about how his father discriminates against him, etc., yet you ignore this in your response.) You even go on to get close to the point (unintentionally). You say "Of course you didn't [notice Kris and Talia are heterosexal]. Characters who are 'normal' don't stand out to other people who are normal." [I'll leave aside the discussion on "normal" for now, but you know nothing about me, so I suggest you not presume "normality" for me without at least attempting to learn a bit more about me.] Well, you're making my point for me -- Vanyel and Lendel and Stef DIDN'T stand out to me either:they seemed just as "normal"... *sigh* I don't know whether I'm really being obscure, or if you're just choosing to ignore anything I say that doesn't fit your perception. And John, you quote Amber and then refute what she says (<<"I don't think that it was as much that they didn't NOTICE, John, as it wasn't a 'Oh my god, I'm reading about a GAY couple' reaction">>), saying "no...it means 'I didn't know Van was gay." Well, darnit, John, I'm the one who started this whole thing, and I wrote in and said that, yes, "Amber had it right, that's what I meant, exactly," yet you insist on writing in and saying that's not what I meant. I'd like to move on from this topic if it's just me and John writing back and forth. If anyone wants to continue this discussion, email me at madlink4-+AT+-earthlink.net Now, the reason I brought this up in the first place, was to point out that Misty did a great job. Most "straight" authors, when they do have gay characters, they are rather stereotypical (if not the negative flighty male -- like people have been complaining about with McCaffrey, then the author is trying to be "progressive" and uses that whole "spritual, in touch with sensitivity" thing that was being protested recently). Although it's interesting that, tho Misty's had some shaych women, she really hasn't explored these. That's something I'd really like to see. Yikes. I'll step down now. *glancing around, hoping to avoid any baelfire that might be warming up* Sorry for going on and on, but I hate being misunderstood. I'm even open to criticisms and misunderstandings the first time around. (though criticisms don't necessarily have to be presented in the form of Shouting and scorn. I especially dislike scorn...) But when I clarify and my points are ignored and more derision is heaped on me, I get a bit peeved. I'm gonna go study for my tests and chill out now...I promise when I come back I'll be sunny again. :-} Zhai'helleva ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 00:09:25 -0500 (EST) From: Kenneth Allen Hyde To: Misty Lackey List Subject: Re: How are you guys missing this? Message-ID: On Mon, 9 Mar 1998, LCM46 wrote: > Having read all the 'letters' on this issue--it stikes me that those who > claimed innocence re: Van's sexuality were those that admitted reading > the book when 12 to 14 years of age. Granted, youth today is much > "smarter" at an earlier age, but, if they were brought up not hearing > about homosexuality, the parts about Van just may have gone over their > heads, so to speak. It just could have 'read' as a very nice, close > friendship??? I have to say that I agree with John on this one. I am completely at a loss to think how anyone (no matter how "innocent" or sheltered) could possibly read the Last Herald Mage and not know that Vanyel was gay. I mean, Misty makes if rather explicitly clear in the narration that Tylendel is gay (if fact, there is a specific scene at court where Vanyel is told this) and I think you would have to be in really major denial to not understand that Van and 'Lendel are lovers by the end of the book (the line to Withen about Van "playing ewe to Tylendel's ram" is pretty explicit as well as Jaysen's problems with Van gayness. I suppose that if you were 10 years old and very sheltered (i.e. didn't even know what sex was), it might be possible to read the books and just not understand, but I'm fairly sure that even a very naive person would have to realize that something was going on, even if they weren't quite sure what. Oh, and I agree with John on another point. Y'all just do not need to be making fun of Southern speech. After all, y'all are the ones who don't have a distinct 2nd person plural pronoun. *giggle* /me goes off to curl up with his new "Heritage of Southern Cooking" book and sighs "I miss Oklahoma...although, come to think of it, I don't miss it right now since we're heading into Tornado Season." May the seas be your solace and the forests a refuge for your spirit, Cennydd Councilor of Mist Kenneth Allen Hyde | No matter how subtle the wizard, a knife Univ. of Delaware | between the shoulder blades will seriously Dept. of Linguistics | cramp his style -- Old Jhereg proverb kenny-+AT+-Udel.Edu | A mind is a terrible toy to waste! -- Me //www.ling.udel.edu/hyde/prof/ken.html ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 08 Mar 1998 21:26:35 -0800 From: Niki Nibbe To: mercedes-lackey-+AT+-herald.co.uk Subject: Re: How are you guys missing this? Message-ID: <35037D8B.70D2-+AT+-earthlink.net> Really quickly, wanted to say that the Goddess of Domesticity/Laundry had a good point about possibly not "getting" the implications. Though I was about 19 or 20 at the time, I was not yet sexually aware, in any sense of the word. The Shaych relationship was just as foreign as a hetero relationship -- I had no basis on which to judge either, so I refrained from any judment. AT that point in my life, though I actually was aware of the sexual aspect of Van's relationships, they were just as foreign to me as Talia & Kris's relationship. And yes, I could recognize that Van was being persecuted in his home for his sexuality; I was ostracized and teased because my classmates thought I was a lesbian simply because I had NO sexual preference (read: if you're not boy-crazy and ultra-feminine and demure, you're not acceptible as a woman in this society). And I wasn't about to try to distance myself from that accusation or try to prove them wrong by acting more "straight" or "normal" -- I never thought there was anything "wrong" with homosexuality. It just got lumped in with sex in general -- all of which was fine for ther people, but not of interest to me. It was just kind of bizarre to have people think I was sexually interested in anybody. *sigh* Okay, I checked and there are no new messages waiting, so I think I can turn the computer off now. Lady Niki ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 8 Mar 1998 22:18:44 -0800 (PST) From: Ana Cotton To: mercedes-lackey-+AT+-herald.co.uk Subject: braid:lots and lots Message-ID: <19980309061844.4821.rocketmail-+AT+-web4.rocketmail.com> Emily the Invisisble said, in response to my comment about a sequel to Mairelon the Magician: >Yes, that is indeed a sequel.> Ana jumps up and down, yippeee! woohoo! I'll attempt to restrain myself now. ------------------- Stasia asked: >That brings ME to a "reading" question. Does anyone else get a >"feeling" when it comes to picking up a book your own library, the community library, or the bookstore> that you >HAVE to read a certain book at a certain time, and you aren't >satisfied with any other book you may try to read? >>> OH YES! I have a rather large, diverse library of my own, and I have times when I cannot find a thing to read. I may pick up and discard five or six books, or more before finding something to read. Heck, there have been times when I have actually said: I have nothing to read. --------------========= Shadowdancer wrote: >I also (shock horror shiver) like some romance stories. Especialy the >Gothic ones.>>> Gothic isn't that bad. My prob is the ones where the heroine *HAS* to fall in love with the guy, be he nice or an absolute jerk. I also tend to dislike the ones that go really serious, and life threatening. --------------- Izzy wrote: >Reading in class-Did that till now. This is the first school I've >been in that I actually have to pay attention to get good grades. >(Gotta love those CA public schools!) Granted, I still draw/write >notes for stories during classes like math, music, etc. (Like I'll >need this. Feh.)>>>> *giggle* I wrote an entire short story in my Radio production class. And I have written most of my Halls of Mist posts in that same class. Well, its either that or fall asleep! (I'm sorry, but, like, I knew that CD players read the underside of the CD!)--one of the many, many little boring things my Prof impresses upon us feeble minded students. ------- Rainbow said: >Talking of Van, and him being Shay'a'chern I noticed it and >thought 'ut oh, DON'T let Mum see this....' Strict family, luckily >Mum and Dad hardly read, but I didn't think 'argh how HORRIBLE, yuk, >disgusting'> Don't I bloody well know it. There's a *reason* I made both my sisters read LHM. ----------- Ben wrote: >"It's better to have loved, and lost, then to never love..." > (Ana digs out the her Oxford Dictionary of Quotations) That would be Alfred, Lord Tennyson (1809-1892) who said: "'Tis better to have loved and lost. Than never to have loved at all." And Samuel Butler (1835-1902) wrote: "'Tis better to have loved and lost, than never to have lost at all." ---------- John said: >This is a sort of general response...when I asked what non-genre >fiction the rest of us read, I meant non-fantasy, non-sci-fi stuff. >That's really what I was curious about...oh well.>> I *did* answer and say what other fic I read! (yeah I know, I also stated which other SF/F I read too, and I will *not* use the excuse that 'oh, but everyone else was doing it' either. I did it because I like plugging my fave authors.). Hell, I even admitted to *gasp*horror* reading, and enjoying Regency Romances! You want more? Hmm, Ok, I still read the Saddle Club series, and the Thoroughbred series, and I like reading Elizabeth Peters (hard to catie her, she's mystery/romance/archeology). Oh, and Barbara Michaels.... === Hugs, Ana, proud Knight of Fluff. Watch "Three"! "So, I stole Niles' ovaries!"-Frazier to his father. http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Vault/6573 _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free -+AT+-yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 04:08:54 EST From: Kago23618 To: mercedes-lackey-+AT+-herald.co.uk Subject: Re: How are you guys missing this? Message-ID: <88ed7839.3503b1a8-+AT+-aol.com> Ok, not to beat a dead horse or anything, but calm down people, geesh... haven't you ever read a book and totally missed something? oh, and ken-+AT+-udel.... I'd usually applaud you for missing Okla (ain't it great?, I mean y'all just have no idea how friendly the people are here) but right now It's very cold & trying to snow/rain/something... wait a couple of months ;) lets see... other authors: Eco, Davies, Hawking, Tolstoy, Crichton, Grishom (hey... a little fluff never hurt anyone) ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 17:02:14 -0800 From: skyfire-+AT+-t-online.de (skyfire) To: ML mailing list Subject: OBound/Fiddlers Faire Message-ID: <35049116.FCCC116-+AT+-t-online.de> In the last digest I read that _Oathbound_ and _Fiddler's Faire_ are already out in the US and I, sitting here in ol' Germany can't even order them! re FF: There wasn't much info on the Baen? homepage, so would somebody be willing to tell me what stories it contains? All of her short stories or just a selection? re Oathbound: Somebody remarked (complained?) that it contains "old" stuff from the previous books. Since it was announced as a collection of *all* the T & K short stories (is it?), some of which where back then published as _Oathbreakers_ (with some rewriting and re-editing, methinks), one should be rather glad: no more running around searching for out-of-print S & S volumes. ;) sinking back into lurkerdom Khenta Blaufalk skyfire-+AT+-t-online.de aka Skyfire k'Vala, bonded to Aar Goddess of Incomplete Vocabulary and Garbled Grammar ********************************************************************** ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 09:58:27 -0800 From: "Marv Watson" To: Subject: braid Message-ID: <01bd4b84$f67a0500$ba8030cc-+AT+-skywolf> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002D_01BD4B41.E856C500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In responce to the "what other books does everyone read" question, I'd = have to say that I read just about anything. What I like a little more = than the others (besides fantasy) is pop sub-culture (I don't even know = if this is a genre, I'm making it up as I go) that is slowly (but = thankfully) moving over into mainstream fiction. Right now I'm = currently terrifying the library with the cartloads of books I'm = checking out (grin). =20 Happy Birthday to anyone with a birthday in March!!! (Yes, I'm not = very lucid right now, but that's just ok)=20 ObMisty- I wonder if anyone could tell me the sites where you can find = all of Misty's up and coming stuff. Andone more thing, can anyone tell me how to get this annouying double = print of what I've said when I post? I've been noticing it when I look = at my messages and mentally wince. Thank you ever so... Swingfully Yours, Skywolf and Misha Priestess in the Order of John the Guitar Player Dames of the OAM "An' it don't mean a thing, If it ain't got that swing..." : ) ( :=20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_002D_01BD4B41.E856C500 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In responce to the "what other = books does=20 everyone read" question, I'd have to say that I read just about=20 anything.  What I like a little more than the others (besides = fantasy) is=20 pop sub-culture (I don't even know if this is a genre, I'm making it up = as I go)=20 that is slowly (but thankfully) moving over into mainstream = fiction.  Right=20 now I'm currently terrifying the library with the cartloads of books I'm = checking out (grin). 
 
    Happy Birthday to = anyone with=20 a birthday in March!!! (Yes, I'm not very lucid right now, but that's = just ok)=20
 
ObMisty- I wonder if anyone could = tell me the=20 sites where you can find all of Misty's up and coming = stuff.
 
Andone more thing, can anyone tell = me how to get=20 this annouying double print of what I've said when I post?  I've = been=20 noticing it when I look at my messages and mentally wince.  Thank = you ever=20 so...
 
Swingfully Yours,
Skywolf and Misha
Priestess in the Order of John the = Guitar=20 Player
Dames of the OAM
 
"An' it don't mean a thing, If = it ain't got=20 that swing..."
    :  )  = ( =20 : 
 
------=_NextPart_000_002D_01BD4B41.E856C500-- ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 13:04:40 -0500 From: "marty l. adkins" To: mercedes-lackey-+AT+-herald.co.uk Subject: Red Star Rising Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19980309130440.0068b35c-+AT+-pop.mindspring.com> _Red Star Rising_ was the original title for what was later published as _Dragonseye_. We were on vacation for a week and so are just now getting caught up on backlist--50+ digest postings in ye olde inne-boxe! Fun, but worse than cramming for final exams. Normally, I'd wait to see if anyone else addressed this, but was afraid I'd forget to respond. After all, we can't have our librarians [especially listsib ones] wasting their time looking for books that don't exist, when they can be doing much more useful things--like stocking _Oathblood_, so it's available by interlibrary loan. There, an obMisty [whew of relief]. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 15:14:53 -0300 From: Eleonora Scoseria To: mercedes-lackey-+AT+-herald.co.uk Subject: Re: OBound/Fiddlers Faire + what we read Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19980309151453.007bcdf0-+AT+-www.multi.com.uy> At 16:44 9/03/98 GMT, Khenta (welcome back, BTW!) wrote: >In the last digest I read that _Oathbound_ and _Fiddler's Faire_ are >already out in the US and I, sitting here in ol' Germany can't even >order them! I can't begin to tell you how much I sympathise. I live in South America, in Uruguay, and there are no bookstores that will order the books I want . Have you tried ordering through the net? I order regularly from Amazon, Future Fantasy, and a former listmember who owns a bookstore, and it helps. I do have some sort of unresolved Post Awful problem, tho. Some things take a week and others take 3 months . Go figure! >re Oathbound: >Somebody remarked (complained?) that it contains "old" stuff from the >previous books. >Since it was announced as a collection of *all* the T & K short stories >(is it?), some of which where back then published as _Oathbreakers_ >(with some rewriting and re-editing, methinks), one should be rather >glad: no more running around searching for out-of-print S & S volumes. >;) Well, yes, I also heard a comment about the novella included with it being not so good, so I can't say I am dying to lay hands on it. What I do regret tho, is that such cool characters as Tarma and Kethry should not get more in the way of meaningful novels, and just rate a quick collection of old material. ===== On another subject, I think it was John that asked what else we read. I have been meaning to reply for days but life has been hectic (I know, i know, those who know me well know that my life ALWAYS seems hectic, but let's say it has been particularly so). I do a lot of reading for work and research and my doctorate, so when I do get to recreational reading I tend to go for completely out of this world stuff =) Hence my love of fantasy. I also read Science Fiction, tho not as often now as I used to. Let's say that reading LotR steered me a bit away from SF and definitely into Fantasy. As for SF, I heartily recommend David Feintuch's Fisherman saga, or however it is called. I also LOVED the first 3 books in the Hyperion series by Dan Simmons. And I hear the fourth is even better. Other than that I occasionally read biographies, historical novels, and thrillers. I am ashamed to say that most of my reading is in English, tho my native lang is Spanish. It was sort of a conscious decision. I was finishing my English studies and did not want my English to become rusty, so I started reading in English even more than I did already. My reading in Spanish is mostly poetry (I love Garcia Lorca, Becquer and Benedetti) and the occasional novel by Isable Allende. Also plays, when I am in one of my acting phases. Wow! How I have rambled! Well, those were my .02 =) Peace, Ele Councilor of Mist ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 15:07:52 -0600 From: katiekins2-+AT+-juno.com (Katie Snyder) To: mercedes-lackey-+AT+-herald.co.uk Subject: questions from a newbie Message-ID: <19980309.150831.11598.5.katiekins2-+AT+-juno.com> Hey all! I just joined the list, and would like to introduce myself and ask a couple questions. I'm Katie, and (like all) enjoy Misty's books, as well as most fantasy and most books in general. I was wondering, is the fact that Vanyel was shaych all that important? I mean, I know it was a major part of the book and all, but the whole point was that it didn't matter that he was shaych, he was a person just like everyone else, with problems all people can relate to. Why are we making such a big deal out of it when Misty didn't? (Okay, know I'm new here, and I probably shouldn't start out criticizing, but I just signed on and have already gotten about 20 messages about this, and I'm starting to get a little annoyed.) Also, a comment about suicide. (The rest of the messages I've gotten seem to be about this -- I must say, this is *not* the best introduction I've ever had) I don't think a person has to be insane, though I think a lot of people who commit suicide are (at least temporarily). Personally, I've thought about suicide (not about actually doing it, just thinking about it), and I am not insane, but the only reason I don't actually consider it is because I really don't have the guts to inflict pain upon myself. I personally think that whatever comes after this life is better than what I'm going through now, and I can't blame people for wanting to go someplace better. Anyway, enough deep talk and rambling. Lots of smiles Katie : ) _____________________________________________________________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 16:53:17 EST From: SenayRed To: mercedes-lackey-+AT+-herald.co.uk Subject: Re: Holderkin Goddess??? Message-ID: <676d4f22.350464d0-+AT+-aol.com> :::Delurk::: Holderkin worship a God, controlling and very icky, just like the men of their society. They also have a Goddess (which the women follow) who is subservient, veiled and the one who is controlled by the God. Sarah :::Relurk::: ------------------------------ End of MERCEDES-LACKEY Digest 1517 **********************************