[LMB] Re: LMB] Re: Pillsbury Nazgul cover Mostly OT:
paal at gis.net
Tue, 3 Aug 2004 15:09:34 -0400
-- Paula Lieberman
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Lambdin-Abraham" <a.abraham at mail.utexas.edu>
> On 3/08/2004, at 6:42 AM, Mervi.Hamalainen at uta.fi wrote:
> > Well, at least it's not a Conan & nude women picture...
> That might have been preferable. Sure it would delude a great many
> people about what's inside, but some might read it and like, and the
> rest probably won't return it.
Maybe to YOU.... Equal exposure or NONE!!! I have exceeded my lifetime
tolerance of female bimboes with to or without bikinis, and Mark Rogers
female nudes with antigravity inflated b**bs and such in SF artshows. There
was quite a stir some years back when a male artist had some giant canvases
with painting of a fat nude male winged fairy smoking a big cigar, most of
the women seeing them though the paintings were hilarious, a lot of men got
And then there's the art by Tristan [can't think of last name] which often
are male nudes.... but those two don't begin to equal the continued flood of
female bimboes with or without bikinis in art shows at SF conventions.
> Besides. Foix & Liss...
EQUALLY clothed or unclothed, PLEASE!!