[LMB] unreliable narrators
azurite at rogers.com
Tue Apr 25 20:22:28 BST 2006
--- Rachel Ganz <rachel at compromise.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
> You should have heard the spleen vented on the
> "Great books of all time" poll. Quality and
> popularity are not necessarily equivalent.
No, not at all, but I've yet to discover a reliable
and consistent definition of 'good'.
> A hundred million people can be wrong.
And often are.
> Now, while we are agreed Harry Potter is an
> unreliable narrator,
Heeey, wait a minute, I never agreed with that. I
don't even understand what it means in terms of Harry
> Nope, he's not the
> narrator, he's the PoV character.
Yes, but one can also be an unreliable PoV character.
> I have always been iffy about the analysis of
> second-fry fiction.
What is second-fry fiction and how does one classify
> It's huge fun, yes, but is it
> worth it? Shooting fish in a barrel - though when
> you examine that metaphor, surely the barrel would
> start leaking real soon.
I'm not sure of your terms but I think a lot here
depends on the material. Analyzing fiction to figure
out how and why it 'works' or why it doesn't can be
More information about the Lois-Bujold