[LMB] now somewhat OT: and veered away from: SciFi vs Fantasy
Mark Allums
mark at allums.com
Mon Jul 2 05:45:06 BST 2007
Raye Johnsen wrote:
> I have long held the opinion that, as a whole, the
> average person is pretty. People who were/are
> egregriously ugly do not tend to attract mates and,
> when they do, are often unwilling to produce
> offspring, so we are all the descendants of the people
> who were deemed prettier than others, and that got
> passed down. So I wouldn't say that Ista, Umerue or
> Joen were ugly. Perhaps they are simply women who
> would benefit from modern cosmetics. (I know I am!
> I'm much prettier with foundation to smooth out my
> skin tone and mascara to draw attention to my long
> eyelashes.)
Sorry Raye, but I must disagree. What you are thinking of is the bell
curve. Most people, about 60%, are "average", and by average, I mean
reasonably decent-looking, possibly cute in some way, but nothing to
write home about. Then there are the 15% or so that are very
good-looking, and this is where the Hollywood types fit. Finally, there
are the 15% who are really not good-looking at all. (It doesn't add up
to 100% because I am ball-parking.) "Prettiness" is a measure that,
like height, weight, or intelligence, is something that falls in a
predictable pattern. Unlike height or weight, but very like
intelligence, it is hard to define, but we know it when we see it. I
would say that *I* am *not* very good-looking, and fall below average,
but within one sigma of it. In other words, I won't make a baby
cry---probably. However, if you were to see me, you might find the
bridge of my nose cute.* This is true of 75-80% of everyone, and this
explains your feeling that no one is really ugly---because most people
aren't.
--Mark Allums
*Hypothetical example.
More information about the Lois-Bujold
mailing list