[LMB] TSK:L SP: dag and the town drunk
Tzivia Adler
tadler at yeshivanet.com
Mon Jul 16 23:47:05 BST 2007
a
d
r
i
n
k
a
d
r
u
n
k
d
r
a
n
k
this story is brought to you by one remark at dag's trial ...
once upon a time there was a patroller. he was a good patroller, and went
out often. he accumulated a lot of credit in camp stores, and seldom needed
it. years went past, and somehow he never married. he slept in his
mother's tent when he was in camp, and things were reasonbly fine.
then the patroller fought a particularly bad malice. of seventy patrolers,
only he and one other survived - and it was the other who killed the malice.
our patroller came home with a bad case of survivor guilt and raided his
uncle's supply of elderberry wine. everyone thought he'd get over it. then
he went to the camp stores and started trading. no one in camp would sell
him wine - they wanted him back on patrol. the (ex) patroller went to the
farmers and traded this that and the other for every sort of wine he could
get.
people stopped saying he would get over it and started calling him the
t/o/w/n/ camp drunk.* everyone felt bad for his mother, who had to watch
her son waste many years of his life. finally the man came to the end of his
supply. it was too difficult to steal things, what with everyone watching
out for his ground, so he went back out on patrol and died soon after.
everyone was glad he didn't get anyone else killed of his own stupidity,
except for the ones who wondered why he didnt prime a sharing knife if he
was so desperate to forget everything.
now the 'what if' question, granted that the whole story above is pure
speculation:
if a man can find a way to fritter his camp stores away without benefitting
the camp - although they try to keep it a closed system, don't they? no
inter-national trade, mostly - can his camp stores confiscated 'for his own
good'? or do they say, he earned it, he can spend it, the idiot.
this question has been brought to you by the council's unspoken but printed
statement - if dag gets his hands on the money that he earned, he's going to
waste it on his farmer piglet.
well, why shouldn't he? it's his stores, if he had spent it as soon as
earned it, he wouln't have accumulated anythng for htem to take away.
"You've been a bad boy! We're going to nationalize your property!"
i also wonder, since dag knew banishment was a very real possibility, and
since he's supposed to be good at strategy, why he didn't quietly take some
things out of stores and stash them out of camp. adn then take another few
things. and some more. especially his horses, to take the other things to
a farmer's market. then they could throw him out, and he'd have more than
his bare skin to support his wife ... no kids yet but what if htey came
while he was banished?
ziviya
* can't really just say camp drunk, sounds too much like campy drunk wich i
think means something very different....
a
d
r
i
n
k
a
d
r
u
n
k
d
r
a
n
k
More information about the Lois-Bujold
mailing list