[LMB] Gender roles (was Predators vs. Protectors)

Tzivia Adler tadler at yeshivanet.com
Sun Jun 3 17:58:53 BST 2007


From: "Richard Macdonald" <don_iain at verizon.net>
> The primary reason for the male as protector of the individual
> and society is totally biological as men are expendable to the
> maintenance of a society, women are not. With the loss of a
> portion of the male population does not prevent a future
> replacement generation the way that a loss of a significant
> portion of the female population does. Men cannot replace
> themselves, only women can make the future generations.
> -- 
> Don Iain of Rannoch, OWST


wait, wait - i've read this argument before. in a book which, on this list, 
i assume everyone esle as read too.

on barrayar, in the time of isolation, they protected the baby by locking 
down the whole woman.  on beta, they did it by locking down the gonads.

i'll take beta, thanks.  i am eternally grateful that i was born after hte 
time women were no longer considered a protected commodity to be handed from 
father to son-in-law, and back to ehr father if hubby died.

ziviya, with a few kids and economically dependent on spouse. 




More information about the Lois-Bujold mailing list