[LMB] [SPAM?] Re: (NotOT) stalkers

[William A Wenrich]

Azalais Aranxta wrote:

On Tue, 22 May 2007, Elizabeth Holden wrote:

> Well, I think it is. And personally I'm not sure I'd want to
> date a person who said 'no' when he or she meant 'yes' or vice
> versa. You'd never know where you stood with them.

<<That can be fun as a game when everyone's clear what's actually
going on, in an established relationship.  But not any other
time.

At the same time you can't wear your heart on your sleeve or it
will get trampled.  I've learnt through bitter experiences that
if you want sex to mean commitment you need to wait until there
actually is commitment to have sex, and that it's a bad idea to
admit to someone how deep your feelings for them run if you have
not taken the time to evaluate what their actions say about their
feelings, first.>>

Is anyone else reminded of the advise concerning not cheating (giving false
messages) with the Betan earrings? I believe it was in ACC, something about
if too many people flew "false colors" it would mess thing up for everyone
else.


William A. Wenrich
I am a Christian, husband, father, son, and American. Here I stand. I can do
no other. God help me!