[LMB] OT: Female exams, etc.
B. Ross Ashley
redlion at sff.net
Tue Nov 27 03:53:49 GMT 2007
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:14:58 EST, ELLINOR at aol.com wrote:
> I would certainly encourage every female over the age of 18,
> sexually active or not, to get a Pap test. Yes, it's a
> little embarrassing but, if nothing's found, then you're
> pretty much clear for the next 5-6 years or so before
> you need to go again.
Absolutely, but get an HPV test too.
> Mammograms don't 'hurt,' but you can bet if men had to have the
> equivalent test on their genitalia they platforms would be lined
> with velvet and padded with foam rubber! :)
Damn straight.
> As far as the female cervical cancer vaccine, I'm very skeptical.
> The commercial they show here in the U.S. even states it doesn't
> protect against all types of cervical cancer and you're still
> supposed to go for Pap tests. If you go for them regularly,
> your chances should be pretty good of catching any problems in
> time. I fear that they'll lull women into a false sense of
> security, leading to a rise in incurable cases.
Anything is possible; OTOH it really a specific vaccine against HPV,
which is implicated in most cervical cancer.
> I am skeptical in general of vaccines anymore. Anyone else
> think they're the basis of the huge rise in autism in children?
> Or am I just a conspiracy theorist?
I know people who are on both sides of that question, and I'm with
Elizabeth Moon - I think it highly unlikely. But then I'm one of the
Connecticut schoolkids they clinical-trialled the Salk polio vaccine on
back in '54. No ill effects yet.
--
B. Ross Ashley http://brashley46.livejournal.com
http://brashley46.no-ip.info
"It would be too painful to think that there are worlds somewhere
where I got everything right." Sulien, in _The King's Name_, by Jo Walton
Registered Linux user # 402119
More information about the Lois-Bujold
mailing list