[LMB] OT: When Favourite Authors Screw Up
Dorian E. Gray
israfel at eircom.net
Mon Oct 1 19:10:27 BST 2007
Margaret said...
> Raye Johnsen wrote:
>>
>> I was rereading one of my favourite Georgette Heyers,
>> 'The Grand Sophy', this weekend, and one of the minor
>> characters - in fact, the male half of the secondary
>> pairing - has just recovered from mumps when he enters
>> the action, after an absence of about six weeks.
>>
>> So I spent the entire weekend sitting there, telling
>> myself, /German measles! Not mumps, German measles!/
>> Because mumps in an adult body isn't the same as mumps
>> in a juvenile body. It's a longer, more debilitating
>> illness and one of the consequences is permanent
>> impotence - NOT something a male romance hero, even in
>> a comedy of manners where everyone's clothes stay
>> firmly on, should have.
>>
>> It's clearly a case of, Heyer gave him an illness she
>> thought would be silly and harmless, and didn't
>> realise that it isn't. It still jars me to read.
>
> I noticed that, but was under the impression that mumps in the
> adult male led to sterility rather than impotence. Not quite the
> same thing.
Well, the sterility is *possible*, not *certain*, as I understand it. Maybe
Charlbury got lucky.
> ...so Charlbury and Cecilia are fated to have no kids. Oh
> well...
For those characters in that place/time, that is actually quite a big deal.
It was very definitely the wife's duty to produce an heir to her husband's
title/lands - and a legitimate one! If Charlbury *was* rendered sterile by
his mumps, their marriage will be affected by the lack of children, and not
for the better.
Until the sky falls on our heads...
Dorian.
--
Dorian E. Gray
israfel at eircom.net
http://dorianegray.livejournal.com
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake."
- Napoleon Bonaparte
More information about the Lois-Bujold
mailing list