[LMB] "Civilization isn't just electricity."
Nancy L. Barber
nlbarber at mac.com
Thu Feb 7 19:08:00 GMT 2008
At 12:39 PM -0600 2/7/08, Lois McMaster Bujold wrote:
>The thing I wonder is, why isn't more being done to bring more
>hydroelectric on line in the U.S.? Talk about a proven system, and
>green as all get-out. Geography? Politics? Does anyone know why this
>isn't being more promoted?
Geography and environmental effects, is my understanding.
Large-scale hydro takes a good-sized river with a good
amount of 'fall' to get adequate head. The prime sites for
hydro dams in the U.S. have largely been exploited.
Small-scale hydro has many more potential sites, but then
each plant is smaller (natch). Small-scale plants are mostly
used for power for a single smallish industry, for example.
Environmentally, building a dam and reservoir alters the
flow regime of the river downstream, interferes with fish
migration, changes the habitat for a large stretch of stream,
and so forth. All these factors all go on the cost side of any
cost-benefit analysis of new hydro.
Nancy Barber
More information about the Lois-Bujold
mailing list