[LMB] Barrayan police services
Peter Newman
pnewman at gci.net
Wed Jan 2 10:14:19 GMT 2008
"Scott Raun" <sraun at fireopal.org> wrote
> On 12/30/2007 01:38:48, "Franz Tomasek (Home)" <ftomasek at storm.co.za> wrote:
>> Perhaps the municipal guards are organised by the counts under the
>> authority of the emperor.
>
> I would bet it's something along those lines. Or it might be much
> simpler - the 20 Armsmen swear loyalty _to the count_. An Armsmen is
> supposed to obey his Count's Orders, regardless. If the various
> municipal guards swear loyalty _to the Emperor_, then - to some degree -
> it doesn't matter who their immediate superior is. What matters is
> that, when it comes to Count's Orders vs. Emperor's Orders, they've
> already sworn to obey the Emperor.
I'm not sure if the text evidence supports this. Miles speaks
of 'Lord VorBohn's Municipal Guard' not 'the Municipal Guard'.
I think that it is simpler than that, a Count is due fealty from
_all_ the people of their district, including the cops. the
difference between a municipal guardsman and an Armsman is that
an Armsman is specifically oath sworn to the Count and a cop,
like everyone else just has the normal duties of everyone in the
district. Its, in political science terms, a federal system of
government, not a unitary system of government. YMMV.
More information about the Lois-Bujold
mailing list