[LMB] Nuclear Reactor Design
Stewart Dean
sdean7855 at earthlink.net
Thu Jan 3 03:07:48 GMT 2008
Some years back (2-3-5?) I remember a front page of the NYTimes Tuesday
Science section about new reactor design. One of which was truly
fail-safe in that if everyone running it just flat out disappeared, the
reactor would quiesce. Not by virtue of control logic, but inherent in
the design, the structure. IIRC, it had to be forced to run hot to
generate power.
Note 1: Yes, we still don't know what to do with the waste, plutonium
byproducts are a horror show for aeons, and we're getting very little of
the available energy out
Note 2: Now the peak oil has come and gone, the nuclear power apologists
are agitating for new plants...with the same old unstable designs.
To parahprase Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz of the Galactic Hyperspace Planning
Council:
"What do you mean you've never built a reactor that's fail-safe? For
heaven's sake mankind, have you got a death wish?"
--
// Stewart Dean == Kingston, NY
// home: 845-336-4815 sdean at sdean.net
// work: 845-758-7475, sdean at bard.edu
More information about the Lois-Bujold
mailing list