[LMB] OT: old honey
Mark Allums
mark at allums.com
Wed Jan 23 04:16:46 GMT 2008
Agnes Charrel-Berthillier wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2008, at 6:27 PM, Mark Allums <mark at allums.com> wrote:
>> Also, don't feed it to very young children--it's a choke
>> hazard.
>
> I thought that the prohibition against honey for infants under one
> year old was because of the (very low) risk of botulism?
I believe this is also mostly a wives' tale, but with some merit.
Botulin microorganisms can grow in nearly any medium. An anaerobic
medium causes the production of some very toxic stuff. But botulism is
a poison, not an infection. The toxin produces paralysis. I suppose
that a very young child could be vulnerable. So, to answer your
question, perhaps there is more than one reason to not feed a very young
person honey. Does anyone else have any expertise in this area?
While I am here, I confess that while I am certain that honey not be fed
to hummingbirds, I am less certain as to why. The saccharine hypothesis
I am not sure of. I am afraid that the reasons may be conflated.
"Don't feed honey to hummingbirds, don't feed saccharine to
hummingbirds." Someone sometime may have confused the two, and
perpetuated a myth that honey contains saccharine.
Anyway, old honey is usually perfectly good. I am told that honey has
been found in Egyptian tombs, and though crystallized, of course, was
found to be edible.
--Mark Allums
More information about the Lois-Bujold
mailing list