[LMB] List Biz: about QOTD
Pat Mathews
mathews55 at msn.com
Sun Mar 2 23:06:42 GMT 2008
I love it! I think the 3-day schedule is a good idea.
http://idiotgrrl.livejournal.com/
> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 21:59:54 +0000
> From: tora.smulders at gmail.com
> To: lois-bujold at lists.herald.co.uk
> Subject: [LMB] List Biz: about QOTD
>
> Hello my fellow LMB list members!
>
>
> That includes any of you reading this -- digest readers, lurkers, and
> archive readers -- this means you!
>
> It has been exactly 2 weeks since I started this experiment of
> questions of the day (QOTDs) on an every other day basis.
>
> I will tentatively call it a success so far as I can tell.
>
> I'll list my thoughts below, but I'd like now to ask all of you (yes,
> every one of you reading this!) to let me know what you think of this
> exercise.
>
> Is it something you'd like to see continue? Something you'd like to
> see end? Something you'd like to see more often (every day?) or less
> often (three times a week MWF or twice a week TTh)?
>
> Questions submitted and chosen in a different way? Somebody else to
> organize it?
>
> Whatever you guys think about it -- reply to this message onlist or
> privately to me at tora.smulders at gmail.com. Feel free not to respond
> if you already have. I'll take those already sent onlist and offlist
> comments into consideration.
>
> Basically, I'd like a consensus on where this should go. I feel I've
> run it all myself as I please and I'd like a feel from the group
> before going further.
>
> I'll email tomorrow's question as scheduled and we'll see from the
> replies where it goes from there.
>
>
> My summation:
> PROS:
> 1- new and interesting questions
> 2- quite well-thought out and insightful answers
> 3- some discussion of questions
> 4- some spin-off on topic discussion
> 5- much more overall on topic discussion on list
> 6- some more participation and/or interest from long-time lurkers, etc.
>
> CONS:
> 1- increased list traffic? hard to keep up with?
> 2- not so many other threads -- the QOTDs and spin-off questions
> dominate and there is less other on topic chat and possibly less off
> topic as well
>
>
> I was hoping for the Pros and am quite happy with how that turned out.
> It's nice to see the Bujold list discuss Bujold's work as
> intelligently as always, but more of it. However, I didn't mean for
> the QOTDs to monopolize all the list's energy. But if the other
> listmembers don't mind that, then I'm okay with it too. Because I'm
> really enjoying the questions you all send in and the answers.
>
> I'd like to see it continue, and I'm happy to run it indefinitely, if
> you're all okay with that. Just collecting and emailing out the
> questions is okay for me time-wise even when I'm very busy. Monday,
> Wednesday, Friday might be a good schedule, perhaps? Plus, I wouldn't
> mind thinking up some of my own questions to add in! ;-)
>
>
> Thanks everyone,
> Tora
> --
> Lois-Bujold mailing list
> Lois-Bujold at lists.herald.co.uk
> http://lists.herald.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lois-bujold
More information about the Lois-Bujold
mailing list