[LMB] : Political Discussion
tonyz at eskimo.com
Mon Jan 31 21:07:49 GMT 2011
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:54:47AM -0800, Jeff Shultz wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Damien Sullivan
> <phoenix at ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote:
> > Cryoburn says every Komarran has one vote, inalienable, just like in
> > ordinary democracies. They can also have additional votes, based
> > originally on public investment, and now maybe simply on money and
> > inheritance of wealth. It could have started out as a corporate sham
> > democracy from the beginning, or it might have been fairly egalitarian
> > in the beginning and still a functional flawed democracy today, with
> > Galeni exagerrating because of his sympathies. Insufficient textev.
> It could be one of those things where the more capital you brought to
> the colony (thereby helping insure it's success), the more votes you
> were rewarded with.
The British experimented in the 19th century with extra votes for
things like, e.g., a university degree. Not sure it changed the
Also worth asking is: how does the voting balance swing? If the
oligarchs have enough extra votes from wealth to sway the balance,
then it's not really a democracy even if everyone has an inalienable
Western Buddhism is like Unitarianism without all the harsh dogmas.
More information about the Lois-Bujold