[LMB] lusting after Aral
becca_price at yahoo.com
Sun Apr 14 01:10:01 BST 2013
This may take this conversation into OT territory.
What about men's fiction writers like Lee Child? (I read one -I think it was a Lee Child, and found the gun porn to be very disturbing). Or are they more violence-as-porn rather than sex-as-porn? (my husband refers to my romances as relationship porn.) or are we taking the term "porn" to such an extent that it loses any real meaning?
There's no such thing as useless information; only information I haven't used yet.
> From: Matthew George <matt.msg at gmail.com>
>To: Discussion of the works of Lois McMaster Bujold. <lois-bujold at lists.herald.co.uk>
>Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2013 8:06 PM
>Subject: Re: [LMB] lusting after Aral
>If you're going to fill my inbox with inappropriate imagery, I think it's
>only fair to return the favor.
>I find it curious that male-oriented erotica (I think it's safe to describe
>parts of the James Bond movies as that) is almost entirely visual, while
>the female equivalent is almost all verbal. But while there are occasional
>female visual equivalents, there's no real male verbal equivalent.
>(The novels of Mickey Spillane most certainly do *not* count. And are
>extremely disturbing to boot.)
>Lois-Bujold mailing list message sent to becca_price at yahoo.com
>Lois-Bujold at lists.herald.co.uk
More information about the Lois-Bujold