[LMB] Games & Sports
howard at brazee.net
Thu Sep 5 13:21:49 BST 2013
On Sep 4, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Peter Granzeau <pgranzeau at cox.net> wrote:
>>> What about non-team sports such as golf?
>>> I doubt I will *ever* understand golf.
>> It is reported that an 1892 article in Punch was the first to describe golf as "Hit a Very Small Ball into an Even Smaller Hole, with Weapons Singularly Ill-Designed for the Purpose."
> Ha! An interesting take on what has also been called "A good walk, spoiled."
> Golf can be a team sport--usually a set number of matches between members of two teams. The Ryder Cup is a set of matches between two teams (from the US and Europe), played in various ways--scotch doubles, best ball foursomes, and individual matches. There is no "medal" scoring, I believe (e.g, all are played to win the most holes, not to score lowest on 18 holes)
I went to a Solheim Cup practice round last month with my granddaughters.
I was thinking how one can think golf doesn't make sense - while playing Solitaire. Certainly standard Solitaire makes less sense. And most computer games.
The "most" in that line brought me back on-topic.
We see one on-topic computer game, which isn't used as a time killer the way most all of ours are used. Thinking on it, it also is an example of computers more advanced than a typical phone of today. (Are there other examples? I expect the Haut used more advanced computers - but far future SF is very rarely about extrapolation that far, it's about our issues *now*).
The point is that that simulation wasn't created primarily for fun - but as a teaching aid. We see mention of sports that are useful for combat as well.
More information about the Lois-Bujold