[LMB] OT: real world implants
pgranzeau at cox.net
Wed Sep 11 16:34:22 BST 2013
At 01:47 PM 9/10/2013, you wrote:
> > You are ignoring the point of the OP.
>I think you're not accounting for human nature. If I had had (or someone I
>knew had had) such an experience, no way would I try any other IUD.
> Presumably the flaws of the Dalkon Shield weren't known until they showed
>up; who is going to risk being the "lucky" one to discover the next one's
>flaws? Now there's more solid data to work from and better techniques so
>it's a better risk but that "entire generation of American women" were most
>likely choosing to depend on methods that didn't put them in the hospital.
There are risks to every medical procedure. At the time you were
fitted with a Dalkon Shield, obviously the dangers were not then
known, and had not been discovered in testing. Once there was a
wider experience, their dangers became known, and the item was
removed from use.
At the time I got my first cataract removed, I had to watch a 30
minute tape explaining all of the dangers (up to and including
removal of the eye, and even death).
I am now alive because I have an artificial aortic valve. I nearly
died after the operation (in fact, I did die the day after but they
got me going again). If they said I needed something else, I would go do it.
More information about the Lois-Bujold