[LMB] another hyphenation dilemma

M. Haller Yamada thefabmadamem at yahoo.com
Tue Sep 29 02:19:10 BST 2015

Thank you, John. I love a bit of history. 
I think it does boil down to choose a style manual and a dictionary, and stick 
with it. Unfortunately, when writing in a field of new words (or lots of made-up 
ones), not everything is going to be in the reference books, so it helps to know 
why my style manual chose the rules it does, and then extrapolate. 
I used to use the AP Style Manual, but unfortunately, the people behind that are 
writing as a guide for American newspapers. American magazines seem to go with 
the Chicago Manual of Style, and I have heard rumors that most U.S. publishers 
do, too. I'm hating CMoS, but I suspect a lot of that is learning curve. 
I'm thinking about changing my dictionary, though. I find it really handy to have 
the Merriam-Webster dictionary online, and CMoS recommends Webster's Third New 
International Dictionary as well as the abridgment, Merriam-Webster's Collegiate 
Dictionary. But they don't seem to be very precise with the compound words. Maybe 
I need to pay to get that higher level of precision . . . .
Anyway, I can't tell you how glad I am to now know that (!) was known as 
*punctus admirativus*. Why do I find that so hilarious? (-: I may need therapy . . . .

More information about the Lois-Bujold mailing list