[LMB] Monogamy

Eric Oppen ravenclaweric at gmail.com
Thu Jun 28 18:43:10 BST 2018

You know, I wonder what WOULD surprise them?  Incest?  (And this might
lead  to a very interesting discussion of what _does_ and _does not_
constitute "incest."  For instance, do step-siblings count?
Siblings-by-adoption? Relatives by marriage?  In-laws?  Or is it only
incestuous if it's between close genetic kin?)

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 5:12 AM, Marc Wilson <marc.wilson at gmx.co.uk> wrote:

> On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 09:44:00 -0500, Beatrice_Otter
> <beatrice_otter at haugensgalleri.com> wrote:
> >Let's look at what we get of Betan attitudes.  Obviously, poly is normal,
> there, from lots of details mentioned in the thread. And when Cordelia
> comes to Barrayar, she gets confused by a lot of sex things, but not by
> monogamy. She thinks it's stingy that you're only ALLOWED one partner (i.e.
> the social pressure forcing it) but doesn't seem to have any problems with
> it as a general concept or as applied to her relationship with Aral.  ("Now
> he's monogamous.")  She's neither offended/sad/regretful that she can't
> have poly relationships publicly (so she's not a heavily poly person being
> forced into monogamy because Barrayar) nor relieved that she is now free
> from poly pressure (so she's not a monogamous person who was forced into
> polygamy because Beta).  Her general attitude seems to be that
> relationships should not be straight jacketed by culture into any
> particular form, but left to the inclinations of the people involved.
> It would seem that poly is, if perhaps not default, certainly on the
> spectrum of unsurprising options on Beta.
> --
> Follow the trend lines, not the headlines. - Bill CLinton
> --
> Lois-Bujold mailing list message sent to ravenclaweric at gmail.com
> Lois-Bujold at lists.herald.co.uk
> http://lists.herald.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lois-bujold

More information about the Lois-Bujold mailing list