[LMB] Monogamy, actuality
fishman at panix.com
Sat Jun 30 05:49:26 BST 2018
------ Original Message ------
From: "Joel Polowin" <jpolowin at hotmail.com>
To: "lois-bujold at lists.herald.co.uk" <lois-bujold at lists.herald.co.uk>
Sent: 06/30/2018 00:24:52
Subject: Re: [LMB] Monogamy, actuality
>I am having trouble parsing this message as anything but an assertion
>that poly is to monogamy as a lightflyer is to a current automobile.
>And I really don't think that's the case. A lightflyer is so much
>better than a current automobile that if they were equally available,
>I can't imagine that anyone would use an automobile except historical
>recreationists (e.g. the Society for Creatively Anachronistic
What good is a lightflyer in a forest?
More information about the Lois-Bujold