[LMB] Monogamy, actuality
mathews55 at msn.com
Sat Jun 30 22:07:39 BST 2018
the in-laws of my children, yes. m in-laws, no. ymmv
From: lois-bujold-bounces at lists.herald.co.uk <lois-bujold-bounces at lists.herald.co.uk> on behalf of Eric Oppen <ravenclaweric at gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2018 11:35 AM
To: Discussion of the works of Lois McMaster Bujold.
Subject: Re: [LMB] Monogamy, actuality
One thing about a large circle of "in laws" is that you have a lot bigger
support system for when things go South. Having had to operate on my own
_de facto_ since college, I can appreciate that in ways that people who
feel oppressed by their big families can't imagine.
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 6:20 AM, Gwynne Powell <gwynnepowell at hotmail.com>
> From: Joel Polowin <jpolowin at hotmail.com>
> Some snippage....
> pouncer at aol.com wrote:
> > I suspect long-surviving institutions like monogamy are similar to long
> > used contraptions like the automobile.
> ... Some people just don't feel a significant attraction
> to more than one partner. Some feel an attraction, but wouldn't be
> comfortable with their partners having other partners, so live within
> the constraints of fairness.....Some feel an attraction, but find that
> *one* relationship is complicated enough to do well, and don't want
> to mess it up.
> Gwynne: Surely another important factor is that the more people in the
> relationship, the more in-laws you have. That could be pleasant, or
> tolerable, or the seventh circle of Hell.
> Lois-Bujold mailing list message sent to ravenclaweric at gmail.com
> Lois-Bujold at lists.herald.co.uk
Lois-Bujold mailing list message sent to mathews55 at msn.com
Lois-Bujold at lists.herald.co.uk
More information about the Lois-Bujold