[LMB] TSK - Echoes
mathews55 at msn.com
Sun Jul 21 22:05:15 BST 2019
Unless they have the equivalent of human intelligence, no. Though they are incredibly dangerous, and the results of their actions are certainly evil.
From: lois-bujold-bounces at lists.herald.co.uk <lois-bujold-bounces at lists.herald.co.uk> on behalf of Howard Brazee <howard at brazee.net>
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 3:02 PM
To: Discussion of the works of Lois McMaster Bujold. <lois-bujold at lists.herald.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [LMB] TSK - Echoes
> On Jul 21, 2019, at 2:26 PM, Pat Mathews <mathews55 at msn.com> wrote:
> Yes. A beast acting in accordance with its own nature may be dangerous (or just very annoying), but in its innocence, you can't call it evil.
> A human being who knows the good and doesn't do it, or does active harm, that's evil. And Neeta was not only evil, she was extremely petty.
So malices aren’t evil.
Lois-Bujold mailing list message sent to mathews55 at msn.com
Lois-Bujold at lists.herald.co.uk
More information about the Lois-Bujold