[LMB] TSK - Echoes

Pat Mathews mathews55 at msn.com
Sun Jul 21 22:05:15 BST 2019


Unless they have the equivalent of human intelligence, no. Though they are incredibly dangerous, and the results of their actions are certainly evil.
________________________________
From: lois-bujold-bounces at lists.herald.co.uk <lois-bujold-bounces at lists.herald.co.uk> on behalf of Howard Brazee <howard at brazee.net>
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2019 3:02 PM
To: Discussion of the works of Lois McMaster Bujold. <lois-bujold at lists.herald.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [LMB] TSK - Echoes



> On Jul 21, 2019, at 2:26 PM, Pat Mathews <mathews55 at msn.com> wrote:
>
> Yes. A beast acting in accordance with its own nature may be dangerous (or just very annoying), but in its innocence, you can't call it evil.
>
> A human being who knows the good and doesn't do it, or does active harm, that's evil. And Neeta was not only evil, she was extremely petty.


So malices aren’t evil.
--
Lois-Bujold mailing list message sent to mathews55 at msn.com
Lois-Bujold at lists.herald.co.uk
http://lists.herald.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lois-bujold


More information about the Lois-Bujold mailing list