[LMB] What makes a character irredeemable?

Eric Oppen ravenclaweric at gmail.com
Tue Jul 30 03:44:53 BST 2019

I wouldn't wish what happened to Horseriver on anyone---and I am known for
being a vindictive swine.  "It's not my fault!  I'm a tragic victim of
Corsican Alzheimer's---where you forget everything but the vendettas!"  And
I do think the Quintarians were out of line with that whole "forcible
conversion" thing---but I was never a big fan of that anywhere.

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 6:50 PM Joel Polowin <jpolowin at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Matthew George <matt.msg at gmail.com> wrote:
> > But, here's the thing - as readers, we're primed to view both those
> > destructions as suitable and proper.  The sundering and destruction of
> > Horseriver is clearly meant to be perceived as a tragedy, although he
> > probably did more damage than either Dondo or Joen.
> >
> > So my question is:  how does LB cause us to view Dondo's destruction as
> > just and right?  Induce us to not shed tears at his destruction.  Because
> > it seems clear that's the authorial intent, and one that is very
> successful.
> Horseriver is shown to be in a trap that is (mostly) not of his
> own making.  He has endured centuries of torment.  He wants to end it
> all, and his sanity is questionable.  His great sin -- I'm using that
> term loosely -- is that he's willing to take all of the people he's
> responsible for with him.  Apart from that, he's not intentionally
> causing suffering.
> Whereas Dondo has none of those justifications.  The eponymous curse
> was twisting things to the worse, but there's little indication that
> it was a significant factor in Dondo's personality.
> Joel
> --
> Lois-Bujold mailing list message sent to ravenclaweric at gmail.com
> Lois-Bujold at lists.herald.co.uk
> http://lists.herald.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lois-bujold

More information about the Lois-Bujold mailing list