[LMB] OT: historical analogue for the meteor in The Calculating Stars by Mary Robinette Kowal

Raymond Collins rcrcoll6 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 7 12:35:10 BST 2021

I am familiar with Nature Magazine. It has a peer reviewed process before
it publishes an article.
Retraction watch.com on the other hand doesn't seem to have any form of
peer review. Just some variation of a Twitter format for any Tom, Dick, or
Professor Harry to cast aspersions on the scientific validity on the
article of what actually happened at the the site of Tell el-Hamman. Some
3600 years ago. The fact of the matter is research went into establishing
what happened that day. Bio-chemical research, physics,  chemistry  etc. By
someone saying "the pictures have been altered doesn't convince me
otherwise. I need Real scientific Proof not just some Trumpian generated BS
to convince me otherwise.
I sorta think Tell el-Hamman maybe got wiped out by a space rock. But I
need real proof and not bullshit to convince me otherwise.
Sorry about the diatribe. I promise to behave better. 😌

On Wed, Oct 6, 2021, 7:25 PM Damien Sullivan <phoenix at mindstalk.net> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 03, 2021 at 12:40:03PM -0400, alayne at twobikes.ottawa.on.ca
> wrote:
> > Archeologists have found a case where they think an exploding meteor
> > destroyed a city:
> >
> >
> https://www.cbc.ca/radio/quirks/sep-25-bronze-age-town-destroyed-by-meteor-global-warming-makes-animals-shapeshift-and-more-1.6187428/ancient-jordanian-town-destroyed-by-a-meteor-blast-may-have-inspired-biblical-stories-scientists-say-1.6187436
> Strong backlash to that:
> https://retractionwatch.com/2021/10/01/criticism-engulfs-paper-claiming-an-asteroid-destroyed-biblical-sodom-and-gomorrah/
> --
> Lois-Bujold mailing list message sent to rcrcoll6 at gmail.com
> Lois-Bujold at lists.herald.co.uk
> http://lists.herald.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lois-bujold

More information about the Lois-Bujold mailing list