[LMB] Education for men
WILLIAM A WENRICH
wawenri at msn.com
Wed Sep 8 23:59:59 BST 2021
There is what was called an improvement to the “new” math that came out, I believe, in the ‘70s and ‘80s. As to how I know about it, I’ve sat in on several of Hazel’s math classes and read her textbook. Although the procedures are structurally sound, they take a lot more time and writing than the math that was taught when I was in grade school. As an example, what we called borrowing one from the next column now has to be subtracted and all of the zeros written out.
Another point example is, if you are solving the equation 22-7=x, you first say that that’s the same as 10+12-7 and instead of memorizing that 12-7=5 the student is told to solve 10-7=3 and 3+2=5. Then 10+5=15 to get the answer. All perfectly sound but more work.
William A Wenrich
Christian, Husband, Father, Granddaddy, Son, & American. Here I am. I can do no other. God help me!
From: Lois-Bujold <lois-bujold-bounces at lists.herald.co.uk> on behalf of Kenton Schoen <kdschoen1 at gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 1:30:26 PM
To: Discussion of the works of Lois McMaster Bujold. <lois-bujold at lists.herald.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [LMB] Education for men
After Sputnik there was a great effort to reform and modernize science and
math education in the USA. Part of this was led by School Mathematics
Study Group, financed by the National Science Foundation, they produced,
among other things a set of large size paperback textbooks. This was
referred to as The New Math. My memory is that it included more, sort of
background explanation, like the Associative, Commutative and Distributive
Laws of Addition and Multiplication, rather than just learning your plus
and times tables.
In the ensuing decades I have often joked that my brother and I were the
only students who strongly preferred the New Math to the old. He is a
university Math professor.
There was a lot of political opposition to the New Math, much of that from
people who did not want federal involvement in curricula, as that might
lead to nationwide teaching of evolution and that the South weren't the
oppressed good guys before and during the Civil War.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021, 12:37 PM Greg Hennessy <greg.hennessy at cox.net> wrote:
> I once posted, I don’t know if It was on this list or Facebook, the
> steps needed to subtract large numbers using Roman Numerals. They are
> almost the same as the steps used in the New New Math.
> What is New New Math? And are these the actual steps, or a copy of what
> someone claimed
> to be the actual steps in an attempt to discredit New New Math?
> Lois-Bujold mailing list message sent to kdschoen1 at gmail.com
> Lois-Bujold at lists.herald.co.uk
Lois-Bujold mailing list message sent to wawenri at msn.com
Lois-Bujold at lists.herald.co.uk
More information about the Lois-Bujold