[LMB] Education for men
egern at protonmail.com
Sun Sep 12 10:56:15 BST 2021
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Wednesday, September 8th, 2021 at 2:28 AM, Elizabeth Holden <alzurite at gmail.com> wrote:
> for that.
> Some were literate,some weren't. The literate ones pretty much stand out.
> Henry II in the 12th century was known for his erudition and love of books.
> He made a huge difference to the history of England. The jurisprudence and
> legislative theory of his time was way more significant to the future than
> his wars and his dramatic family.
You never hear about that,it is just wars and Beckett - interesting, I'll have a look :-)
> Keep in mind that in the middle ages, "literate" meant "literate in Latin"
> because that was the language in which all scholarly works were written,
> unless in Byzantium. The point is, by their standards, most of us would not
> be considered literate.
Scholarly works yes, what about the rest? Would for instance court cases be heard and written down in latin?
I know that correspondence between monarchs in the Scandinavian countries were written in their own language.
Writing in the vernacular was for songs and poems. "Writing" more in the
> sense of composing than of "writing down". That was more the field of
> Henry's son Richard, but only a few of his poems and songs have survived. I
> only know of the text of one ballad in Occiatine, but there may be more.
It is a very interesting question. Surely some letters, archives, accounts and the like were written in the vernacular?
More information about the Lois-Bujold