[LMB] flimsys? added stout and gun
marc.wilson at gmx.co.uk
Thu Nov 26 20:59:09 GMT 2015
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 20:13:57 -0800, Damien Sullivan
<phoenix at mindstalk.net> wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 06:00:36PM -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 05:45:46PM -0500, Walter S Bushell wrote:
>> > > On Nov 25, 2015, at 08:49, Karen Hunt <huntkc at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > In general, you're supposed to imagine that somebody has performed a truly
>> > > superb translation from future-speak into modern "whatever the author's
>> > > language is.
>> there is mention in, er, I thinkits Barrayar, of Cordelia sitting in
>> the library at Vorkosigan House, struggling thru an old book in which
>> English is written phonetically in Cyrillic.
>> As best I can recall it explicitly says English.
>But the English of 2900 is unlikely to be the English of 2000. Chaucer,
>circa 1380, also wrote in "English". A bit hard to read straight for a
>modern, though. Never mind Beowulf, also in (Old) "English", which may
>as well be a different language.
Apart from some insertions for flavour, Tolkien didn't write LotR in
It's a well-trodden road, writing future, past or imaginary words in
modern dialogue with a few trigger words.
If Lois could somehow grab some 2900's "English" through a wormhole,
we'd probably not understand it that well, if at all. Though perhaps
there's an argument that having everything written down might stabilise
the language somewhat.
I suppose the rate of linguistic drift in the internet age is being
More information about the Lois-Bujold