[LMB] Actually Jodi Taylor Re: OT: Jodie Taylor
marc.wilson at gmx.co.uk
Tue Oct 17 17:34:19 BST 2017
On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 02:15:21 -0400, Damien Sullivan
<phoenix at mindstalk.net> wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:50:09AM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
>> > Books in series like Bujolds could be labeled by hundreds. then there are plenty of numbers
>> > for inserting books written out of chronological order.
>> reminds me of writing old Basic programs... you needed line/statement
>> numbers, they had to go in increasing order but they did not need to
>> be sequential. so people tended to write
>> 100 ...
>> 200 ...
>> 300 ...
>> for just the purpose you describe. made for yucky code (not that Basic
>> isn't all yucky anyway...)
>Went by 10s in what I learned. And it was a fine idea. No more yucky
>than counting by 1s, and you get to insert as needed. (This was also a
>world without full-screen editors.) In retrospect, line-number BASIC
>with lots of GOTO was good preparation for understanding assembly
>language, while being faster to do interesting things for a newbie
I saw this concept brilliantly abused in Sperry mainframe BASIC. A
program that was very heavily commented, with all the comments having
the *same* line number.
When you submitted the program to the interpreter, via @ADD, all except
the last instance disappeared (and that one said: 999 REM see source for
Statistics show that of those who contract the habit of eating, very few survive. - Wallace Irwin
More information about the Lois-Bujold