[LMB] new Penric
domelouann at gmail.com
Sun Oct 22 17:20:38 BST 2017
chuckle. Also, swoon. This seems very quick.
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Matthew George <matt.msg at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd like to think that:
> 1) We give allegiance to quality works, not authors, so we at least read
> novels before we nominate them for awards, especially since we don't know
> if they will qualify. An excellent work might still not be the best we
> encounter in a given year.
> 2) We're wise enough not to meddle in the timestream. Even if history
> cannot be alerted, the consequences to ourselves for attempting to do so
> are likely to be disastrous, and if it can, the nature of existence might
> be imperiled - at the very least, everything after the alteration point
> could be altered. I cannot condone sending the novella a decade back
> regardless of how good it will be.
> Matt G.
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 5:56 PM, M R Dolbear fm <
> little.egret at dolbear.fastmail.fm> wrote:
> > So do we nominate it as a novel for the 2007 Hugos?
> Lois-Bujold mailing list message sent to domelouann at gmail.com
> Lois-Bujold at lists.herald.co.uk
More information about the Lois-Bujold