[LMB] new Penric

Louann Miller domelouann at gmail.com
Sun Oct 22 17:20:38 BST 2017

chuckle. Also, swoon. This seems very quick.

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Matthew George <matt.msg at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'd like to think that:
> 1)  We give allegiance to quality works, not authors, so we at least read
> novels before we nominate them for awards, especially since we don't know
> if they will qualify.  An excellent work might still not be the best we
> encounter in a given year.
> 2)  We're wise enough not to meddle in the timestream.  Even if history
> cannot be alerted, the consequences to ourselves for attempting to do so
> are likely to be disastrous, and if it can, the nature of existence might
> be imperiled - at the very least, everything after the alteration point
> could be altered.  I cannot condone sending the novella a decade back
> regardless of how good it will be.
> Matt G.
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 5:56 PM, M R Dolbear fm <
> little.egret at dolbear.fastmail.fm> wrote:
> >
> > So do we nominate it as a novel for the 2007 Hugos?
> --
> Lois-Bujold mailing list message sent to domelouann at gmail.com
> Lois-Bujold at lists.herald.co.uk
> http://lists.herald.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lois-bujold

More information about the Lois-Bujold mailing list