[LMB] Levels of Bafflement
margaret at devere.net
Tue Jan 16 15:09:14 GMT 2018
Margaret: Can you comment on how musical rhythm and speech rhythm are and
are not the same?
John: Urk. Regarding speech rhythm in (British) English, I think the point
is that it simply does not -organise- patterns of duration. They are there,
and as Catherine said are likely to bear some relation to any formal
metrical pattern, but their controlled patterning is neither mandated nor
notated in prosody.
Musical notation, in specifying notes of particular durations (crotchet,
quaver, minim etc.), in the dotting system for extending durations, in time
signatures, has the exact duration of components as a primary axis.
Accentual-syllabic prosody, conversely, is concerned with the patterning of
more and less stressed syllables, which naturally occurs in all speech but
in metrical verse is formally organised into lines typically comprising a
repeating unit against which variations stand out.
Somewhat more earnestly, it sounds to me as if your school teaching did not
properly distinguish metre and scansion. Very briefly, the metre is the
fixed, repeating pattern in the abstract, while the scansion is what your
voice, or anyone else's, makes of the words spoken aloud.
With metre, there is correct and incorrect. If you tell me that Hamlet's "To
be or not to be" is in dactylic monometer, you're wrong. But with scansion
there is no correct and incorrect, though there may be perverse, wrenched,
or inconsistent as well as effects of national or regional accent, inspired,
Allowing that it's hypermetric, Hamlet's famous line is an iambic
pentameter. This is the F text.
To be, or not to be, that is the Question :
and it -could- be scanned as wholly regular with an unstressed (old term,
feminine) hyperbeat :
to BE, / or NOT / to BE, / that IS / the QUES / tion :
In no sense is that scansion of the metre wrong ; but it's not how I would
myself scan it, because I'd say
to BE, / or NOT / to BE, / THAT is / the QUES / tion
The metre is five iambs and the hyperbeat ; my preferred scansion has an
inverted foot, a trochee, in fourth place -- and that's not wrong either.
IMO, having been teaching the stuff for decades, the failure to distinguish
properly between metre and scansion is the subject's single greatest bane at
school level, and the consequences of the confusion both put many people off
it altogether, and produce, for e.g., the painfully awkward readings aloud
by those who, say, stop to breathe at the end of each line regardless of
sense and enjambment.
I am informed -- thank you.
Not only did my education not distinguish between meter and scansion -- it
never mentioned scansion. I have always mapped meter onto musical timing.
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
More information about the Lois-Bujold