[LMB] OT: (very) Why has saddle stitching gone away?
fishman at panix.com
Sat Nov 24 17:42:06 GMT 2018
As I have said before, the magazines that I complained of specifically
used to often be 200 pages or more. As to page creep, there is a very
simple solution. Most magazines are printed oversize and then
guillotined to final size after binding. This takes care of page creep
inherently. Yes, saddle stitching requires pages to be divisible by
four, BUT almost everything is printed in 16 page signatures for
economic reasons so that is not a limitation. I repeat, why has saddle
stitching disappeared? I have yet to hear a valid reason.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Jonathan Spencer" <jonrspence at aol.com>
To: lois-bujold at lists.herald.co.uk
Bcc: fishman at panix.com
Sent: 11/24/2018 09:38:10
Subject: Re: [LMB] OT: (very) Why has saddle stitching gone away?
>Saddle stitching suffers from page creep which limits the number of pages due to thickness. Page creep is the need to shift the printed portion of the page closer to the outside margin as you move away from the center of the magazine, so the content that is closest to the spine on a particular page is not obscured.
>Saddle stitching also requires the number of pages to be divisible by 4 whereas perfect bind does not.
>Also by not using staples, the printing process is considered to be more eco-friendly.
>Jonrspence at aol.com
>Lois-Bujold mailing list message sent to fishman at panix.com
>Lois-Bujold at lists.herald.co.uk
More information about the Lois-Bujold