[LMB] Politics??? Or the nature of reality?

WILLIAM A WENRICH wawenri at msn.com
Tue Oct 9 03:23:32 BST 2018

Scientific truths change but are not overthrown. Just because it breaks down at the quantum level Newton’s laws still work on the macro level. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 8, 2018, at 9:36 AM, Rachel <anglerfish at gmail.com> wrote:

>> I wonder what the consensus of the list is concerning reality. I heard a
>> lot these days about his truth or her truth or my/your truth. Not so much
>> about the truth.
> I think it would depend on what sort of truths you are talking about. If we
> are looking at basic scientific processes, there are certainly things that
> are well-described enough that I think we can take them as truth for now
> until new data comes along. (I am very comfortable accepting something as
> truth for now and changing my understanding tomorrow if new data demands
> it, though I understand that some people want to be comfortable that a
> certain thing will be truth *forever*.)
> When it comes to the reality of someone's experience, that gets much
> trickier because A) experiences are filtered through our own
> emotions/understanding/history and B) memory is much more malleable than
> we'd like to believe and the things that we remember as "true" are probably
> not perfectly true.
> That being said, I don't think I believe in relative morality. I rather
> like Sam Harris's suggestion that whatever leads to the greatest human
> flourishing and the least suffering must be the most moral.
> My husband and I had an interesting coffee talk yesterday morning about
> animal consciousness versus human consciousness and how it actually takes a
> surprising amount of effort to be consistently conscious of the people
> around you as individuals living their own life and having their own
> experience rather than just objects contributing to your own experience
> (e.g. that nincompoop who just cut me off in traffic). But that ability to
> compassionately see others as doing their best to live their own lives
> seems very central to our humanity.
> --
> Lois-Bujold mailing list message sent to wawenri at msn.com
> Lois-Bujold at lists.herald.co.uk
> https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.herald.co.uk%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flois-bujold&amp;data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca9762a3e6b8d445ff0f208d62d33c3a8%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636746097675074015&amp;sdata=u9aX6XnrahPM3oCk%2FPnjaz2lP6r7rEH8fo3ohWS0%2FQI%3D&amp;reserved=0

More information about the Lois-Bujold mailing list