[LMB] OT: More words that I HATE!!
marc.wilson at gmx.co.uk
Mon Sep 28 22:20:53 BST 2020
On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 23:15:39 +0000, "Harvey Fishman" <fishman at panix.com>
>------ Original Message ------
>From: "Marc Wilson" <marc.wilson at gmx.co.uk>
>To: "LMB" <lois-bujold at lists.herald.co.uk>
>Bcc: fishman at panix.com
>Sent: 9/27/2020 7:11:06 PM
>Subject: Re: [LMB] OT: More words that I HATE!!
>>On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:39:20 +0100, <thirlsmith at greenbee.net> wrote:
>>>Replying to Eric: that V for W was IIRC a Cockney mannerism in the early C19 - Marryat (Peter Simple) also refers to it. It has lapsed since, but I cannot remember why or exactly when. In other parts of the country "waistcoat" might be "weskit", as Tolkien puts it into the mouth of Ham Gamgee.
>>>I believe also that (pace my countryman Mr Wilson) Johnson, on our side of the pond, had at least as much to do with the divergence of spelling as Webster on the other side. But I am very open to correction on this point.
>>I think what Johnson achieved was to *regularise* spelling; up to the
>>publication of his dictionary, it was far more mutable.
>>Webster set out, with malice aforethought, to establish non-British
>>Whenever people say 'we mustn't be sentimental,' you can take it
>>they are about to do something cruel. And if they add, 'we must
>>be realistic,' they mean they are going to make money out of it. - Brigid Antonia Brophy
>What on Earth is wrong with dropping a 'u' other that it may be
Potayto, potahto. The point was, it was done to be different, rather
than to be "correct".
Colo(u)r is pronounced "culler", in reality: neither spelling is
The "u" crept in from the French "couleur", which derived ultimately
from the Latin "color" - so that was the pretext. But neither spelling
reflects the pronunciation.
Make headphone wires out of shoelaces and shoelaces out of old
headphone wires. That way your headphones will always untie
themselves and your laces will never come undone.
More information about the Lois-Bujold